|
Post by Justin Case on Apr 7, 2014 19:39:52 GMT -5
I do believe Undertaker wants to get out sometime. Ending the streak is like a period at the end of a sentence. It had to end, so there will be no more "what if" type of scenarios that would draw him back. I think when he wants to retire for good, it will be, for good. No regrets. As for if it was good for Lesnar to take him down or not? I'm not against it. No one better imo. Seemed to fit, story wise, it's ok with me. It was a fun ride to watch throughout the years, glad I was around to see it. No regrets.
|
|
|
Post by cordanus on Apr 7, 2014 20:01:01 GMT -5
True. Plenty of memories in those Wrestlemanias. Lots of great action and at least I seen the match on you tube. I do have respect for those who work their ends off. Even though I'm not a big fan or anything, I still admire the great work they did over the years. Willing to make a bet that Lesnar will introduce Undertaker at his Hall of Fame induction.
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Wylde on Apr 8, 2014 22:04:36 GMT -5
The problem is, Reigns or Cesaro would have made sense, preferably Reigns because the shield took out taker after WM last year. This could have been Taker's revenge. You can't pass off Lesnar as this unbeatable Monster because John Cena has already beaten him! Anyone beating Lesnar now will have no real impact. This could have been the chance to elevate someone to the next level, and instead, the historic moment is wasted on someone who is already an established star. I'll say it again-the WWE is being run by Idiots!
|
|
|
Post by Chilling Nightmare on Apr 9, 2014 6:37:40 GMT -5
In the end, I don't think it was a bad idea. Too much of a chance Reigns or Cesaro might get lost in the shuffle if they don't take it to the next level with the fans.
|
|